<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Pioneer Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Read about Pioneer Visions &#38; Values...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:13:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Methodist Partners by Billy Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=225#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=225#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Hi Nick. You can mail me at bk@newcommunity.org.uk We are currently in discussion with the central London circuit exploring partnership at Hinde Street Methodist Church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick. You can mail me at <a href="mailto:bk@newcommunity.org.uk">bk@newcommunity.org.uk</a> We are currently in discussion with the central London circuit exploring partnership at Hinde Street Methodist Church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Methodist Partners by Billy Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=225#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=225#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Hi Nick. You can mail me at bk@newcommunitychurch.org.uk We are currently in discussion with the central London circuit exploring partnership at Hinde Street Methodist Church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick. You can mail me at <a href="mailto:bk@newcommunitychurch.org.uk">bk@newcommunitychurch.org.uk</a> We are currently in discussion with the central London circuit exploring partnership at Hinde Street Methodist Church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Methodist Partners by Nick Holt</title>
		<link>http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=225#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Holt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=225#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Hi Billy

Am aware of many &#039;contemporary trends&#039; in UK Church life.  Read your post with great interest. Have you been approached by any Methodist churches or circuits in London District? I am in East London.

Could you please send an email link - would love to dialogue / discuss further with you. And set out more &#039;background&#039; for me and Linda

Shalom

NH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Billy</p>
<p>Am aware of many &#8216;contemporary trends&#8217; in UK Church life.  Read your post with great interest. Have you been approached by any Methodist churches or circuits in London District? I am in East London.</p>
<p>Could you please send an email link &#8211; would love to dialogue / discuss further with you. And set out more &#8216;background&#8217; for me and Linda</p>
<p>Shalom</p>
<p>NH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Brand Too far by Ibou</title>
		<link>http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=140#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Ibou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=140#comment-43</guid>
		<description>My experience ownrigg up in a medium sized church in the US (approx 250) was that it was easy to just show up and leave without anyone really taking notice. I found the experience of attending a smaller church of about 100 in the UK very different. (I was there for three years.) While I had as much freedom to easily come and go, I definitely felt it was more noticed in the smaller church. I began to build relationships there which resulted in me staying longer, led to stronger friendships, discipleship, and eventually the realization that I hadn&#039;t ever followed Jesus, even though I&#039;d always thought I was a Christian. I observed a real community and deeper fellowship there in that smaller church that I hadn&#039;t seen before. In hindsight I think it was a picture of how the church is described in Acts.In Malcolm Gladwell&#039;s book  The Tipping Point  he talks about the theory that  150 is a magic number  where he describes a social phenomenon seen across multiple types of communities (schools, workplaces, etc). I&#039;m paraphrasing but basically the idea is that approximately 150 persons is the maximum number of people whom we can interact with without feeling that we don&#039;t know how we relate to them. When workplaces rise above that number they have observed productivity levels come to a plateau even while adding additional workers. The idea is that above that number, people begin to feel like  numbers  and don&#039;t think that what they do really matters or makes a difference. I felt that the missional church video above was spot-on in describing church members who don&#039;t think they need to personally prepare themselves to share the gospel, and instead think that bringing someone to church and leaving it up to the pastor is  evangelism.  I think there can be a real danger in a large church where members can begin to depend on the pastors and elders to do the job that I think we are each called to do.I don&#039;t know if the model of a big attractional church really  works    I think the people inside the church probably think it&#039;s an attractive model that works but I&#039;m not sure that the people outside would think the same. As to being  attractive , the apostle Paul talks about being all things to all men   but logically one large church can&#039;t be all things to all men, really it can only be a few key things to only a certain type of people. I think it&#039;s the reason why there tends to be a dominant homogenous group in a church, plus a few attenders in fringe groups. In thinking about how we should  do  church, I find it very helpful to think about Jesus&#039; model of discipling only 12 men over the course of three years with the goal of sending them out to be disciple makers in their own right. I think we see the same model followed by Paul as he trains up other men to plant churches. I find it helpful to remember the cliche that  God has no grandchildren. I would love to see churches begin to plant when they get too large   I feel that this would encourage people who haven&#039;t felt  needed  before to step up to the plate and reveal talents and gifts we haven&#039;t seen before, or for previously dependent people to realize they too can be equipped to become leaders too. I also feel that large churches can make the mistake of depending on the strength of its people whereas perhaps small churches might by necessity be forced to depend on the One whose strength matters, to His glory!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience ownrigg up in a medium sized church in the US (approx 250) was that it was easy to just show up and leave without anyone really taking notice. I found the experience of attending a smaller church of about 100 in the UK very different. (I was there for three years.) While I had as much freedom to easily come and go, I definitely felt it was more noticed in the smaller church. I began to build relationships there which resulted in me staying longer, led to stronger friendships, discipleship, and eventually the realization that I hadn&#8217;t ever followed Jesus, even though I&#8217;d always thought I was a Christian. I observed a real community and deeper fellowship there in that smaller church that I hadn&#8217;t seen before. In hindsight I think it was a picture of how the church is described in Acts.In Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s book  The Tipping Point  he talks about the theory that  150 is a magic number  where he describes a social phenomenon seen across multiple types of communities (schools, workplaces, etc). I&#8217;m paraphrasing but basically the idea is that approximately 150 persons is the maximum number of people whom we can interact with without feeling that we don&#8217;t know how we relate to them. When workplaces rise above that number they have observed productivity levels come to a plateau even while adding additional workers. The idea is that above that number, people begin to feel like  numbers  and don&#8217;t think that what they do really matters or makes a difference. I felt that the missional church video above was spot-on in describing church members who don&#8217;t think they need to personally prepare themselves to share the gospel, and instead think that bringing someone to church and leaving it up to the pastor is  evangelism.  I think there can be a real danger in a large church where members can begin to depend on the pastors and elders to do the job that I think we are each called to do.I don&#8217;t know if the model of a big attractional church really  works    I think the people inside the church probably think it&#8217;s an attractive model that works but I&#8217;m not sure that the people outside would think the same. As to being  attractive , the apostle Paul talks about being all things to all men   but logically one large church can&#8217;t be all things to all men, really it can only be a few key things to only a certain type of people. I think it&#8217;s the reason why there tends to be a dominant homogenous group in a church, plus a few attenders in fringe groups. In thinking about how we should  do  church, I find it very helpful to think about Jesus&#8217; model of discipling only 12 men over the course of three years with the goal of sending them out to be disciple makers in their own right. I think we see the same model followed by Paul as he trains up other men to plant churches. I find it helpful to remember the cliche that  God has no grandchildren. I would love to see churches begin to plant when they get too large   I feel that this would encourage people who haven&#8217;t felt  needed  before to step up to the plate and reveal talents and gifts we haven&#8217;t seen before, or for previously dependent people to realize they too can be equipped to become leaders too. I also feel that large churches can make the mistake of depending on the strength of its people whereas perhaps small churches might by necessity be forced to depend on the One whose strength matters, to His glory!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Brand Too far by Roger Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=140#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=140#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Great reflection Liz, thanks for taking the time. Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great reflection Liz, thanks for taking the time. Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Brand Too far by Liz Figures</title>
		<link>http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=140#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Figures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=140#comment-39</guid>
		<description>this is a very interesting subject. thank you for this helpful article.  

i cant help feeling we lost less people when we were smaller. maybe the bigger churches should have a &quot;riskier&quot; planting strategy subdivide more quickly, even if there are some groups that are possibly less strong or stable than others. when we look back at who we were forming those new churches - how many church brand leaderships would back us these days ? ! 

i was struck very strongly by the teaching some years ago that it is healthy for a christian to have personal access to cell, congregation AND celebration sized groups. obviously i&#039;m thrilled that there are big churches - so many people want to go to them, and they must be good at doing what they do. but do they encourage a certain passivity because their members may have the personal support of being in a cell sized group (10 to 20 ?) but  lack the personal and relationship growth opportunities offered in a moderate sized congregation? how do people learn to prophecy when there is nothing between home group in someone&#039;s living room and speaking in a microphone to several hundred people ? or leading worship, or teaching, or having ideas and seeing if they work ? 

where do new leaders learn in practice - only a tiny percentage of practical learning of anything happens in classrooms, so if people dont get &quot;small&quot; leadership opportunities they will struggle to be big leaders. (i dont understand &quot;small&quot; by the size of the group - leading a cell group effectively might be more pastorally demanding than being an elder with a mainly admin role for hundreds of people). 

i&#039;m biased - my best area of function is in congregations of 50 to 100 people - but i think there are a lot of people like me who can have a go at a lot of things and can grow and contribute, but in larger groups we easily get overlooked, so we will never build up the confidence and experience to participate enough to really feel we &quot;own&quot; something. in &quot;people sized&quot; congregations even new christians can feel like they have something to give and can feel like leaders are accessible and responsive to them. quiet people dont have to compete so much to get attention.

i have been part of several different &quot;new churches&quot; when they were new and of course i have a nostalgia for those days, but there is no backspace button in kingdom life. how can we draw on the wonderful lessons we learned in those early days and integrate them into moving forward ? why do the very people who pioneer new churches sometimes find it harder than anyone else to plant out other people to lead new congregations in the same town ? 

i had a prophetic picture some years back about a spider plant. the natural way it grows is by sending out small &quot;spiders&quot; just like them, on a stalk. in nature these spiders touch ground and root, and eventually the stalk dies off when the baby no longer needs nurturing by the mother. you will see an older plant surrounded by a whole ring of new ones who then make their own rings.  i felt that it was for a particular pastor at that time that he should be nurturing and planting out churches and ministries whilst keeping his roots well tended in our fellowship. but although he could happily encourage activities that were outside the range of our town or outside the ministry of the church, but each time there was a potential &quot;church plant&quot; ( there were 3 that i was aware of) he stopped it just as it was starting to put out roots and called everyone back into the &quot;mother church&quot;. like doing the preachers training course - i think 30 or 40 of us did it over the years and very few ever actually got to preach. i know there were very high disenchantment and disaffection rates - for some it was disastrous for their personal lives, mercifully  lots of people channeled their energies out into missionary or caring organisations. those who remained in the church were also highly dedicated and self motivated people but  a lot of the new people would leave after a while - king&#039;s new clothes and all that. i wish i could say that that church was an exception - sadly i dont think it is. i&#039;ve been involved in other new churches with similar tendencies even if not as strong.


i&#039;m still passionate about church. but i think we have to face some of these issues. i think the growth of the use of social networking on the internet etc will appear to the insecure leaders, and even some apparantly solid ones as making things worse, but as i see people relating to each other in a much more open &quot;flat&quot; leadership way in groups of different sorts i think, i hope, the eventual effect will be of people transferring those experiences into society and i hope church life will be willing to cope with the growth and development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a very interesting subject. thank you for this helpful article.  </p>
<p>i cant help feeling we lost less people when we were smaller. maybe the bigger churches should have a &#8220;riskier&#8221; planting strategy subdivide more quickly, even if there are some groups that are possibly less strong or stable than others. when we look back at who we were forming those new churches &#8211; how many church brand leaderships would back us these days ? ! </p>
<p>i was struck very strongly by the teaching some years ago that it is healthy for a christian to have personal access to cell, congregation AND celebration sized groups. obviously i&#8217;m thrilled that there are big churches &#8211; so many people want to go to them, and they must be good at doing what they do. but do they encourage a certain passivity because their members may have the personal support of being in a cell sized group (10 to 20 ?) but  lack the personal and relationship growth opportunities offered in a moderate sized congregation? how do people learn to prophecy when there is nothing between home group in someone&#8217;s living room and speaking in a microphone to several hundred people ? or leading worship, or teaching, or having ideas and seeing if they work ? </p>
<p>where do new leaders learn in practice &#8211; only a tiny percentage of practical learning of anything happens in classrooms, so if people dont get &#8220;small&#8221; leadership opportunities they will struggle to be big leaders. (i dont understand &#8220;small&#8221; by the size of the group &#8211; leading a cell group effectively might be more pastorally demanding than being an elder with a mainly admin role for hundreds of people). </p>
<p>i&#8217;m biased &#8211; my best area of function is in congregations of 50 to 100 people &#8211; but i think there are a lot of people like me who can have a go at a lot of things and can grow and contribute, but in larger groups we easily get overlooked, so we will never build up the confidence and experience to participate enough to really feel we &#8220;own&#8221; something. in &#8220;people sized&#8221; congregations even new christians can feel like they have something to give and can feel like leaders are accessible and responsive to them. quiet people dont have to compete so much to get attention.</p>
<p>i have been part of several different &#8220;new churches&#8221; when they were new and of course i have a nostalgia for those days, but there is no backspace button in kingdom life. how can we draw on the wonderful lessons we learned in those early days and integrate them into moving forward ? why do the very people who pioneer new churches sometimes find it harder than anyone else to plant out other people to lead new congregations in the same town ? </p>
<p>i had a prophetic picture some years back about a spider plant. the natural way it grows is by sending out small &#8220;spiders&#8221; just like them, on a stalk. in nature these spiders touch ground and root, and eventually the stalk dies off when the baby no longer needs nurturing by the mother. you will see an older plant surrounded by a whole ring of new ones who then make their own rings.  i felt that it was for a particular pastor at that time that he should be nurturing and planting out churches and ministries whilst keeping his roots well tended in our fellowship. but although he could happily encourage activities that were outside the range of our town or outside the ministry of the church, but each time there was a potential &#8220;church plant&#8221; ( there were 3 that i was aware of) he stopped it just as it was starting to put out roots and called everyone back into the &#8220;mother church&#8221;. like doing the preachers training course &#8211; i think 30 or 40 of us did it over the years and very few ever actually got to preach. i know there were very high disenchantment and disaffection rates &#8211; for some it was disastrous for their personal lives, mercifully  lots of people channeled their energies out into missionary or caring organisations. those who remained in the church were also highly dedicated and self motivated people but  a lot of the new people would leave after a while &#8211; king&#8217;s new clothes and all that. i wish i could say that that church was an exception &#8211; sadly i dont think it is. i&#8217;ve been involved in other new churches with similar tendencies even if not as strong.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m still passionate about church. but i think we have to face some of these issues. i think the growth of the use of social networking on the internet etc will appear to the insecure leaders, and even some apparantly solid ones as making things worse, but as i see people relating to each other in a much more open &#8220;flat&#8221; leadership way in groups of different sorts i think, i hope, the eventual effect will be of people transferring those experiences into society and i hope church life will be willing to cope with the growth and development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Brand Too far by Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=140#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=140#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Oh my reply has disappeared! Maybe I&#039;ll repost something similar at a later date. Was on a very similar page to you though Roger from your response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my reply has disappeared! Maybe I&#8217;ll repost something similar at a later date. Was on a very similar page to you though Roger from your response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Brand Too far by Saul Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=140#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Saul Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=140#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Interesting piece.  Not really sure what to make of it although I have thought it for a long time.  I heard that there was one church in my town that has almost closed because everyone left and went to a new church.  There are also a lot of folk who haven&#039;t been in church for years due to inability to get on with anyone who are going to the new churches and suddenly renewing their faith quite vigorously.  Not sure if this is more to do with the great music or God.  Not sure if I&#039;m able to judge either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting piece.  Not really sure what to make of it although I have thought it for a long time.  I heard that there was one church in my town that has almost closed because everyone left and went to a new church.  There are also a lot of folk who haven&#8217;t been in church for years due to inability to get on with anyone who are going to the new churches and suddenly renewing their faith quite vigorously.  Not sure if this is more to do with the great music or God.  Not sure if I&#8217;m able to judge either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Brand Too far by Roger Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=140#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=140#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Hi Ben - interesting reflection and I love the conversation- thanks for posting a response. In the end I&#039;m not claiming to be &#039;right&#039;. I like the last sentence particularly though I&#039;m not clear on what &#039;business talk&#039; is.I can&#039;t speak for everyone but I don&#039;t sense focus in the UK on becoming am Elder- perhaps even the opposite. Your penultimate paragraph has too much dualism for me. I wonder whether ultimately saltiness leads to strategy, Christ-likeness to creativity and maturity to mission. Now there&#039;s 3 talk headings for somebody to have a go at!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ben &#8211; interesting reflection and I love the conversation- thanks for posting a response. In the end I&#8217;m not claiming to be &#8216;right&#8217;. I like the last sentence particularly though I&#8217;m not clear on what &#8216;business talk&#8217; is.I can&#8217;t speak for everyone but I don&#8217;t sense focus in the UK on becoming am Elder- perhaps even the opposite. Your penultimate paragraph has too much dualism for me. I wonder whether ultimately saltiness leads to strategy, Christ-likeness to creativity and maturity to mission. Now there&#8217;s 3 talk headings for somebody to have a go at!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Brand Too far by Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=140#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pioneer.org.uk/blog/?p=140#comment-25</guid>
		<description>This is a really interesting post, thanks for sharing. I&#039;m not convinced that what we need is a fresh approach to church, but a strengthening of what we already have and know (or maybe had and knew!). Perhaps we are all looking for our glasses when they are still on our heads! I am seriously wondering if I think our churches are in slight chaos. We are genuinely passionate and zealous for God and for good, but do we lack a maturity of mind and an adultness in action? Because we have easy access to his life and calling, I wonder if we can try to live like Paul and not like the communities he tried to establish. Are we trying to be a new covenant community by trying to live like Paul&#039;s new covenant calling?

Maybe we need to do less and be more. Maybe we need to slow down but up our game. Maybe we need to settle down and strengthen up. Maybe it&#039;s less about going out than growing up. Maybe what we need is to recall the pastors and the teachers out of the closet badly labelled &quot;Legalistics&quot; and let all the five/fourfold ministries contribute properly to maturity of the body of Christ. Perhaps we need a rebalancing of &quot;everyone&#039;s a missionary&quot; with &quot;not everyone&#039;s an elder.&quot; Has the teaching in our churches enabled our people to be able to see to four corners of the earth (aka vision) but not know what to do with itself on the four square inches it stands on? The general buzz and talk these days seems to be more about ideas than instruction.

When I look at the teaching of all the New Testament greats, what I see is a need for saltiness more than strategy, Christ-likeness more than creativity, and even maturity over what is often labelled &quot;mission&quot;.

Some of this may well just be about leaving behind the consumerism, individualism, branding and identity creating business talk and getting back to basics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really interesting post, thanks for sharing. I&#8217;m not convinced that what we need is a fresh approach to church, but a strengthening of what we already have and know (or maybe had and knew!). Perhaps we are all looking for our glasses when they are still on our heads! I am seriously wondering if I think our churches are in slight chaos. We are genuinely passionate and zealous for God and for good, but do we lack a maturity of mind and an adultness in action? Because we have easy access to his life and calling, I wonder if we can try to live like Paul and not like the communities he tried to establish. Are we trying to be a new covenant community by trying to live like Paul&#8217;s new covenant calling?</p>
<p>Maybe we need to do less and be more. Maybe we need to slow down but up our game. Maybe we need to settle down and strengthen up. Maybe it&#8217;s less about going out than growing up. Maybe what we need is to recall the pastors and the teachers out of the closet badly labelled &#8220;Legalistics&#8221; and let all the five/fourfold ministries contribute properly to maturity of the body of Christ. Perhaps we need a rebalancing of &#8220;everyone&#8217;s a missionary&#8221; with &#8220;not everyone&#8217;s an elder.&#8221; Has the teaching in our churches enabled our people to be able to see to four corners of the earth (aka vision) but not know what to do with itself on the four square inches it stands on? The general buzz and talk these days seems to be more about ideas than instruction.</p>
<p>When I look at the teaching of all the New Testament greats, what I see is a need for saltiness more than strategy, Christ-likeness more than creativity, and even maturity over what is often labelled &#8220;mission&#8221;.</p>
<p>Some of this may well just be about leaving behind the consumerism, individualism, branding and identity creating business talk and getting back to basics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

